I am pretty sure that he would not sign the statement that states 'have to' save failed banks. You seem to indicate that he only said 'it takes' and that means

I am pretty sure that he would not sign the statement that states 'have to' save failed banks. You seem to indicate that he only said 'it takes' and that means something different. If he would disagree and argue that government should save failed banks, then he would not be a Hayekian at all. I have heard some interviews with him, and that's my interpretation.