4 ms·

Thanks. We're going to production soon with ArangoDB. We have tested 3.1.17, and 3.2 Alpha. 3.2 Alpha seems to be much more efficient with RAM. Would love to kn

Thanks. We're going to production soon with ArangoDB. We have tested 3.1.17, and 3.2 Alpha. 3.2 Alpha seems to be much more efficient with RAM. Would love to know more about what changed in this area.

janemanos 10y ago
We had to implement some preparations for the new storage engine in 3.1 which included changes in the WriteAheadLog. E.g. this consumed additional RAM. With 3.2 the memory needs are much lower as we put in some additional improvements.