6 ms·

Posterous Unveils Pages

51 points by bradgessler 16y ago

deleted 16y ago
[deleted]
whalesalad 16y ago
I dig Posterous... but I cannot see the difference between Posterous and WordPress. Can someone help point that out?
- nuclear_eclipse 16y ago
  One has an elite startup feel, and the other is a platform for "normal" people that just happens to have a popular open source version that you can install on your own server.
- bradgessler 16y ago
  Posterous is all about posting content via Email. WordPress is more about posting content via a web editor interface. Read http://posterous.com/faq http://posterous.com/faq for details on what you can do with an email post on Posterous.
  - a4agarwal 16y ago
    Actually, Posterous has a web editor that's super powerful and easy to use. You can post all content including media without using email if you want
- dimarco 16y ago
  I'm surprised you said "Posterous and WordPress" and not "Posterous and Tumblr", since I see more similarity in the latter. Regardless, I think Posterous boasts simplicity over WordPress. A standard WordPress install starts you off with 7 different active widgets. There are thousands of WordPress plugins to do thousands of things. Posterous is an example of "less is more", in my opinion. I'm much more likely to read a Posterous blog(with standard themeing) all the way to the end than I am most WordPress blogs.
  - iamdave 16y ago
    I think the Posterous/Tumblr dichotomy is a false one. Where they're both ultra-simple microblogging platforms, tumblr is easily more community centric, insular in focus than Posterous, and in my opinion that's where it's strength is. Nearly every avenue of a default feature now found in tumblr has come from innovation that users have made use of when the site was still young and lacked considerable features.
- deleted 16y ago
  [deleted]
- philwelch 16y ago
  You can't host your own Posterous and it has fewer features and no third party plugins but it's easier to use, has built in syndication to TwitFace, and is probably far more secure than WordPress. (Edit: How is this wrong? Was it my playful nickname for Twitter and Facebook collectively?)
- samratjp 16y ago
  The difference is obvious: Posterous lets you post anything from anywhere, and they host it for you with zero setup. Of course the key feature for its success is email posting!
  - arach 16y ago
    It's funny because email is how I started using Posterous. I thought the getting started process was clever. Over time, I started using the bookmarklet more and more. After a year, I would say I use the email feature extremely rarely.
  - SkyMarshal 16y ago
    This. Plus the easy reposting to so many other services. I really like that Posterous can repost to not just Twitter, but Identi.ca, FriendFeed, and Jaiku. And Wordpress, Blogger, Tumblr, and every other blog site. And Youtube, Vimeo, Blip.tv, Flickr and every other media site. Etc. etc... The autopost feature + post by email is the dog's bollocks.
aidanf 16y ago
Does every feature that posterous releases make it to the front page of HN? I mean, pages, it's not some super innovative new feature. Every friggin blog platform on the planet has the ability to create pages. How is this newsworthy and why are people up-voting it?
- jjames 16y ago
  I have to question your reasons for making a stand just now on the re-implementation of standard website features throughout the proliferation of diverse web publishing systems. It's been quite a ride since the first CMSs decades ago but the scenery has been much the same, you must admit. You can claim that the release of standard CMS features by one company or another is not newsworthy (which is why we have the little arrow over there by the link) but I'd then submit that most developments by technology companies (large and small) are less then entirely novel. If those developments are deemed not-news-worthy, HN will have even less to do with the activities of entrepreneurial operations.
  - aidanf 16y ago
    Well last week we had a post about posterous adding markdown and syntax-highlighting and it got 99 points on the front-page. Now we have this post, about them adding the ability to create pages, on the front-page with 17 points after 1 hour. I might be interested in hearing about major or innovative new features at posterous but these seem to me to be fairly standard features for a blogging platform and thus not very newsworthy. We don't get front-page stories every time wordpress or tumblr add a new minor feature. So why are people upvoting this? Is it people who are posterous users and who are upvoting it as a sign of approval? Or people who want to show their support for posterous because they're a YC company. Or are there people who genuinely think that the fact that a blogging app now lets you create a page is really interesting tech news.
    - djb_hackernews 16y ago
      I'm pretty sure submissions about YC funded companies are juiced.
rmorrison 16y ago
I understand that Posterous's "Pages" is a feature, not a product. However, it unpleasantly reminds me of two products named Pages, Facebook Pages and Apple Pages. There have been several times this year where I was searching for answers to questions about Pages, and it was a miserable experience. In part, it was due to the confusion between Facebook Profiles and Facebook Pages, but it was still miserable. Now I am inherently biased against naming a feature or product Pages. It's tricky w/ features, because you want it simple yet distinct,. Unfortunately, the trend is heading towards the "The" and "A".
- petercooper 16y ago
  Using a generic name for a product sucks in general in terms of finding information about it. People don't tend to say "Apple Pages" in every reference to the app. "Windows" is an exception because it was huge before the idea of Web search hit the mainstream ;-)
maukdaddy 16y ago
I can't wait for the next headline: Posterous Reveals Radical New Feature: FRAMES!
flubba 16y ago
Seems like they are actually following the mantra of releasing a dead simply product quickly, and the slowly adding more features so that in the end, the users might as well have signed up for WordPress or Tumblr or similar sites in the beginning. Clever.
kmfrk 16y ago
I thought only Apple got PR with incremental updates.

51 points by bradgessler 16y ago

deleted 16y ago

[deleted]

whalesalad 16y ago

I dig Posterous... but I cannot see the difference between Posterous and WordPress. Can someone help point that out?

nuclear_eclipse 16y ago
One has an elite startup feel, and the other is a platform for "normal" people that just happens to have a popular open source version that you can install on your own server.
bradgessler 16y ago
Posterous is all about posting content via Email. WordPress is more about posting content via a web editor interface. Read http://posterous.com/faq http://posterous.com/faq for details on what you can do with an email post on Posterous.
- a4agarwal 16y ago
  Actually, Posterous has a web editor that's super powerful and easy to use. You can post all content including media without using email if you want
dimarco 16y ago
I'm surprised you said "Posterous and WordPress" and not "Posterous and Tumblr", since I see more similarity in the latter. Regardless, I think Posterous boasts simplicity over WordPress. A standard WordPress install starts you off with 7 different active widgets. There are thousands of WordPress plugins to do thousands of things. Posterous is an example of "less is more", in my opinion. I'm much more likely to read a Posterous blog(with standard themeing) all the way to the end than I am most WordPress blogs.
- iamdave 16y ago
  I think the Posterous/Tumblr dichotomy is a false one. Where they're both ultra-simple microblogging platforms, tumblr is easily more community centric, insular in focus than Posterous, and in my opinion that's where it's strength is. Nearly every avenue of a default feature now found in tumblr has come from innovation that users have made use of when the site was still young and lacked considerable features.
deleted 16y ago
[deleted]
philwelch 16y ago
You can't host your own Posterous and it has fewer features and no third party plugins but it's easier to use, has built in syndication to TwitFace, and is probably far more secure than WordPress. (Edit: How is this wrong? Was it my playful nickname for Twitter and Facebook collectively?)
samratjp 16y ago
The difference is obvious: Posterous lets you post anything from anywhere, and they host it for you with zero setup. Of course the key feature for its success is email posting!
- arach 16y ago
  It's funny because email is how I started using Posterous. I thought the getting started process was clever. Over time, I started using the bookmarklet more and more. After a year, I would say I use the email feature extremely rarely.
- SkyMarshal 16y ago
  This. Plus the easy reposting to so many other services. I really like that Posterous can repost to not just Twitter, but Identi.ca, FriendFeed, and Jaiku. And Wordpress, Blogger, Tumblr, and every other blog site. And Youtube, Vimeo, Blip.tv, Flickr and every other media site. Etc. etc... The autopost feature + post by email is the dog's bollocks.

aidanf 16y ago

Does every feature that posterous releases make it to the front page of HN? I mean, pages, it's not some super innovative new feature. Every friggin blog platform on the planet has the ability to create pages. How is this newsworthy and why are people up-voting it?

jjames 16y ago
I have to question your reasons for making a stand just now on the re-implementation of standard website features throughout the proliferation of diverse web publishing systems. It's been quite a ride since the first CMSs decades ago but the scenery has been much the same, you must admit. You can claim that the release of standard CMS features by one company or another is not newsworthy (which is why we have the little arrow over there by the link) but I'd then submit that most developments by technology companies (large and small) are less then entirely novel. If those developments are deemed not-news-worthy, HN will have even less to do with the activities of entrepreneurial operations.
- aidanf 16y ago
  Well last week we had a post about posterous adding markdown and syntax-highlighting and it got 99 points on the front-page. Now we have this post, about them adding the ability to create pages, on the front-page with 17 points after 1 hour. I might be interested in hearing about major or innovative new features at posterous but these seem to me to be fairly standard features for a blogging platform and thus not very newsworthy. We don't get front-page stories every time wordpress or tumblr add a new minor feature. So why are people upvoting this? Is it people who are posterous users and who are upvoting it as a sign of approval? Or people who want to show their support for posterous because they're a YC company. Or are there people who genuinely think that the fact that a blogging app now lets you create a page is really interesting tech news.
  - djb_hackernews 16y ago
    I'm pretty sure submissions about YC funded companies are juiced.

rmorrison 16y ago

I understand that Posterous's "Pages" is a feature, not a product. However, it unpleasantly reminds me of two products named Pages, Facebook Pages and Apple Pages. There have been several times this year where I was searching for answers to questions about Pages, and it was a miserable experience. In part, it was due to the confusion between Facebook Profiles and Facebook Pages, but it was still miserable. Now I am inherently biased against naming a feature or product Pages. It's tricky w/ features, because you want it simple yet distinct,. Unfortunately, the trend is heading towards the "The" and "A".

petercooper 16y ago
Using a generic name for a product sucks in general in terms of finding information about it. People don't tend to say "Apple Pages" in every reference to the app. "Windows" is an exception because it was huge before the idea of Web search hit the mainstream ;-)

maukdaddy 16y ago

I can't wait for the next headline: Posterous Reveals Radical New Feature: FRAMES!

flubba 16y ago

Seems like they are actually following the mantra of releasing a dead simply product quickly, and the slowly adding more features so that in the end, the users might as well have signed up for WordPress or Tumblr or similar sites in the beginning. Clever.

kmfrk 16y ago

I thought only Apple got PR with incremental updates.