3 ms·
Perhaps I misunderstand you, but a fast forward merge isn't really a merge (there is no merge commit) and by definition doesn't change any commits. So it doesn’
by rlpb 10y ago
Perhaps I misunderstand you, but a fast forward merge isn't really a merge (there is no merge commit) and by definition doesn't change any commits. So it doesn’t require changing any commits, and therefore no signatures need changing either.
Is there some other part of a workflow that you're inferring here that will need changing commits?
- growse 10y agoIf you have a feature branch with multiple commits signed by multiple people, does rebasing that not invalidate the signatures (changes the parent and thus every hash)?
- rlpb 10y agoI see. The rebasing you mention is part the implied workflow I was missing. I see it now. Yes - if the rule is that merge commits to master are not permitted (ie. all commits must be rebased onto master first), then of course one person cannot rebase someone else's signed commits without losing those signatures. Thanks. Theoretically one could devise a tool which allows each contributor to re-sign (in the correct order), but I'm not aware that any such thing exists, and it'd probably be too impractical anyway.