4 ms·
With the explanation about high profile people it makes sense. For the rest of us there is the chicken-egg problem. I can't afford to deny all emails not send t
by anotheryou 10y ago
With the explanation about high profile people it makes sense. For the rest of us there is the chicken-egg problem. I can't afford to deny all emails not send through that system. I whished I could charge a micro-payment for it, like 3 cents, just to keep spam away.
- agora778 10y agoWhy not charge a very small amount like $1? Do you see any problems with that?
- anotheryou 10y agoDepending on your financial background $1 could already be quite a bit. I'd prefer to charge just "not nothing" which should be below 50c for me. Preferably below the costs of a text (costs ~9c here). The bigger problem however is what ever the procedure for signig up is. Even if it's just paypal and a webform for the mail.
- 19eightyfour 10y agoI guess the problem you'd see with that is exactly how this service is differentiated. Yes, it blocks spam ( but so do many other things ), but that's more of a side effect. It's really about purchasing access to busy people. As you say. That's an understanding I have anyway. Please correct it if it's missing something.
- Trufa 10y agoWhy not use reCAPTCHA? It will filter out most the spam.