4 ms·
Also check out this order: https://ia601504.us.archive.org/0/items/gov.uscourts.cand.308136/gov.uscourts.cand.308136.120.0.pdf https://ia601504.us.archive.org/0
by dlgeek 10y ago
Also check out this order: https://ia601504.us.archive.org/0/items/gov.uscourts.cand.308136/gov.uscourts.cand.308136.120.0.pdf https://ia601504.us.archive.org/0/items/gov.uscourts.cand.30...
"[...] the Court first states its strong concern that the memorandum in support of the motion to compel is overly redacted. Our federal courts belong to the public, and the public and the press have a legitimate interest in looking over our shoulders to see the work in progress in our courts. The essence of our work concerns evaluating competing arguments. Parties should not hide those arguments under seal out of a desire to shroud business dealings in secrecy. [...] This theme runs throughout the brief history of this case. Please do not claim privacy over anything less than true trade secrets or other material clearly deserving to be under seal."