>I don't think having a negative opinion towards GG is enough to discredit whatever journalism? My issue with using #GG as an example is that the MSM narrative

>I don't think having a negative opinion towards GG is enough to discredit whatever journalism? My issue with using #GG as an example is that the MSM narrative of #GG is precisely that - and parroting it is lazy and cliché to me. I suppose I've become jaded from the time I spent around #GG. But really, I could have picked any of their other articles. Most of them are rehashes of already-popular topics or pointless drivel like "We found out what camera Kendrick Lamar used to make a tiny planet". The coolest article I actually read was "I asked Tony Hawk if he would teach me how to ollie and he said yes." and not because of the content, but because they actually bothered asking Tony Hawk to teach one of them and he said yes. That is actually kinda cool that they'd fund that for an article. It's different, although the article itself was pretty lackluster and had a bunch of annoying 3-5 second gifs littered throughout. E: Oh god this post has gone through nearly 20 minutes of constant edits. To anyone who was reading one of the 500,000 variations of this post or formulating a response - I apologize. I'm done now.