4 ms·
It was a movie which should've been good, in my opinion, but instead bombed because of a lack of pacing and therefore world creation. I think that's something
by fsociety 10y ago
It was a movie which should've been good, in my opinion, but instead bombed because of a lack of pacing and therefore world creation.
I think that's something the '95 movie did really well, the long drawn out shots of the cityscape with random people walking. It paces the movie really well, and helps create the illusion that the movie is in a real world.
I think it's even more of a shame, because they really nailed the special effects in the 2017 movie. I thought the SFX were awe-inspiring. The movie had way to much packed into it, and would've benefited from slowing down every now and then to introduce better pacing.
- aluhut 10y agoYes it's true, those slow moments were too short but it had more story. I bet if it had those moments longer and less of the story, people would complain about that. There is no way to win here if people want to hate it, they'll find ways.