> Google isn't the destination. Google is many destinations. The ISP isn't a destination, aka a host[1] > Google's top services ...are a different problem at

> Google isn't the destination. Google is many destinations. The ISP isn't a destination, aka a host[1] > Google's top services ...are a different problem at the application layer[2]. Yes, surveillance capitalism business models at Google et al is a serious problem that needs to be addressed. It's still a separate problem from ISP-level surveillance. It is unlikely that the same solution can be applied to both problems. An ISP - aka a business that routes packets in the internetworking layer[3], is a very different market than the network endpoints ("destination", aka "host"). I can (and do) drop outgoing packets to many destinations. > the content (website, video, etc.) You're conflating internet hosts with services provided by those hosts. [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1122#page-6 https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1122#page-6 [2] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1122#page-9 https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1122#page-9 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Application_layer https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Application_layer [3] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1122#page-10 https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1122#page-10 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_layer https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_layer