3 ms·
It may not be perfect for everyone, but in that case, no need to rage. You can just use any of the 38472647893242 different linters out there. What I like abou
by conradk 10y ago
It may not be perfect for everyone, but in that case, no need to rage. You can just use any of the 38472647893242 different linters out there.
What I like about StandardJS is that I don't need yet another config file just for a linter. lintrc, babelrc, webpack.config.js, karma.config.js, etc, etc. Having one less thing for people to need to understand is a nice feature in and of itself IMO.
And I actually tended to disagree with some of the StandardJS choices before adopting it. After working with it for a few weeks, I realize it makes absolutely no difference. I just have a linter that works with no config.
- partycoder 10y agoFor me StandardJS is the same as having no linter at all, because it doesn't take action on the problems that can be actually harmful, like the ones I mentioned. An excessively long function, statement or a complex function is a liability because it almost certainly cannot be tested or reasoned about. And all the negative consequences of not being able to test or verify code.