3 ms·
It's worth remembering a few other things: 1) If the suit is true, then it will almost certainly zero out the investors, and destroy the careers and fortunes o
by throwaway4job 9y ago
It's worth remembering a few other things:
1) If the suit is true, then it will almost certainly zero out the investors, and destroy the careers and fortunes of the executives.
2) Uber has a long history of keeping and promoting executives who lack integrity and show a willingness to break the law.
As such, it is reasonable to assume that Google is making a good faith effort to argue the strongest possible case on their side; and that Uber is likely to lie, cheat, and steal to make the strongest possible case on their side.
- gsnedders 9y ago> 2) Uber has a long history of keeping and promoting executives who lack integrity and show a willingness to break the law. Knowing almost nothing about US Federal civil law, can inferences be drawn from that (and other previous behaviour of Uber)?
- neom 9y agoBecause it's civil it would need to be presented or entered with relevance.
- throwaway4job 9y agoA judge and jury would struggle to use this unless it was very well-sourced, but as external observers who are attempting to make a best estimate, we certainly can.