3 ms·
But then you're competing with Docker images. Not that Docker is that amazing, but I just don't see why anyone would want to use Snap instead of Docker?
by jononor 10y ago
But then you're competing with Docker images. Not that Docker is that amazing, but I just don't see why anyone would want to use Snap instead of Docker?
- mwj 10y agoContainers are for a completely different use case than system packages.
- wmf 10y agoCoreOS and RancherOS have shown how everything can either be built into the base OS image or running in Docker, with no system packages needed.
- darkr 10y agoI think this had been shown somewhat before the time of these whippersnapper distros (Slackware, LFS etc), indeed before the days of RPM, make && make install directly on production servers were how things were done.. and it was not good. Also; in the case of CoreOS, the base image is still built using a package manager (portage). Not sure about that other guy.
- geodel 10y agoI am not sure e.g. how docker image is better for openoffice or eclipse/intellij idea and so on for desktop. I think Snap fits usecase much better. May be multiple snaps combined to create a service/image for a server.