3 ms·

Okay, but from what I've seen Snaps are better (from the perspective of flexibility and simplicity) than Flatpak, isn't this a case where it'd be better for GNO

Okay, but from what I've seen Snaps are better (from the perspective of flexibility and simplicity) than Flatpak, isn't this a case where it'd be better for GNOME to adapt rather than vice versa?

jhasse 10y ago
We'll see, atm Flatpak has already been adapted pretty well: https://kamikazow.wordpress.com/2017/02/09/adoption-of-flatpak-vs-snap/ https://kamikazow.wordpress.com/2017/02/09/adoption-of-flatp... Try the Firefox Nightly for example: https://firefox-flatpak.mojefedora.cz/ https://firefox-flatpak.mojefedora.cz/
- clvx 10y ago
  In distros yes, but in market snappy has been well received https://partners.ubuntu.com/programmes/iot https://partners.ubuntu.com/programmes/iot . For me the next move of which package manager will be adopted is gonna be based on companies which are gonna develop on it and get support. Only when Red Hat enters the game, you'll see a big adoption of snaps. For now, Canonical is ahead in this game.