3 ms·
> As mathematicians have attacked the hypothesis from every angle, the problem has also migrated to physics. eyeroll.. loose use of 'every' is the kind of ove
by justifier 10y ago
> As mathematicians have attacked the hypothesis from every angle, the problem has also migrated to physics.
eyeroll.. loose use of 'every' is the kind of overreaching probability mathematical rigor eschews
quantum mechanics still relies heavily on probability theory and reimann has been probably correct since its inception
it is my intended inference that a mathematical model that maps qm will be mappable to reimann, and without any forgiveness of strict symmetries
- posterboy 10y agoWhat's the motivation for your intention? What is a reimann? The mathematician was called Riemann. Do you mean the Zeta function and it's variants?
- justifier 10y agoi'm sorry if i was unclear.. i am aware of who bernhard reimann is and was using his name as shorthand for the hypothesis originating in his 1859 paper(o): .."and it is very probable that all roots are real."; of which this entire article is about what's my motivation for my intention? I am unsure exactly.. personally? I derive significant joy from working on mathematics; socially? to solve the problem would solidify assumed validity across a varying subset of mathematics and its consequents (o) http://www.claymath.org/sites/default/files/ezeta.pdf http://www.claymath.org/sites/default/files/ezeta.pdf