3 ms·
I doubt they care about their image. Microsoft has traditionally acted in a very monopolistic - sometimes almost solipsistic - manner. In recent years they've b
by pdkl95 10y ago
I doubt they care about their image. Microsoft has traditionally acted in a very monopolistic - sometimes almost solipsistic - manner. In recent years they've broadened their approach a bit, but NIH syndrome is going to be a key part of their culture for a long time.
They may not have even considered that "telemetry" might hurt their image (or profits). Even on HN we regularly see people complaining that they cannot switch to a different OS. Technical solutions sometimes help but MS probably assumes that most people will submit to the lockin. Image doesn't matter when most people are tied to the platform. When games are enough to tie people to Windows, MS can do whatever they want.
- ocdtrekkie 10y agoI disagree. I don't think you need to like Microsoft to notice they are investing heavily in initiatives designed to repair their historical reputation.
- pseudalopex 10y agoThey've done a lot recently to improve their reputation with developers. They don't seem too concerned about losing desktop users.
- jasonkostempski 10y agoI'm a perfect example of this being the case. I'm a .NET developer by trade and I have very few complaints about it, but I only run Windows as a VM at home because I don't want it anywhere near my personal life.