4 ms·
There are no physicists' observations here, as I get it, it is all theoretical work, which is essentially mathematics. It is not rigorous mathematics, otherwise
by giomasce 9y ago
There are no physicists' observations here, as I get it, it is all theoretical work, which is essentially mathematics. It is not rigorous mathematics, otherwise we would actually have a proof, but just a proposed reasoning that in time might be made rigorous and become a real proof. Future will tell us.
- bike4beer 9y agoPhysics Person Here, Let's see U throw 1,000 bags of shit at the wall, hoping one will stick, and call that the solution? ( Actually there is a name for this process, its called the INTEL methodology ) I concur if the RH could have been solved with 'physics' it would have been solved 50+ years ago, one of the first thing Von Neumann did with the machines was tackle this problem. The question beg's to ask is this news? Physicists Tackle RH? How about Garbage Men? There are youtube sites promising virtually anybody on the street one million USD cash to solve this problem, as if nobody has yet to date bothered. Given the age of this problem, and given that computational monte-carlo (physics) isn't going to solve this problem; Lots of super-smart ( >200 IQ ) people R working on this problem, and have been for years; Good Luck people. Great problem to give a super smart kid, to put him in his place.