> I'm guessing that at nine nines that is pretty much a one anyway and it would not even change a single pixel on the screen. There used to be a bug with flex-

> I'm guessing that at nine nines that is pretty much a one anyway and it would not even change a single pixel on the screen. There used to be a bug with flex-wrap: wrap; where an element would wrap to the next line while it should have fit. You could fix it by instead using width: 25%; use width: 24.999999%; so it would be 25% on the screen but it would fix the problem so it didn't wrap to the next line. So you should look out with this.