> That statement doesn't jive with his previous posts. Nope, it does. His original post (not posts) pointed at foul language first and foremost, which was the

> That statement doesn't jive with his previous posts. Nope, it does. His original post (not posts) pointed at foul language first and foremost, which was then compounded by posting an equally charming Amazon review without making any attempt to wait for a reply. So his follow-up matches the post that led to this whole brouhaha. But let's not allow this ruin all the fun of the vigilante justice and trying to beat the living daylights out this guy.