4 ms·
Well I mean for the moon landing hoax debate one can not only look at stuff left behind on the moon's surface let alone the fact that you can bounce a laser off
by kombucha2 10y ago
Well I mean for the moon landing hoax debate one can not only look at stuff left behind on the moon's surface let alone the fact that you can bounce a laser off of mirrors left on the surface to measure the distance from the Moon. It is also high unlikely that such items were placed there using automated methods.
- nsxwolf 10y agoDon't you need a gigantic laser and an observatory to perform the mirror bounce trick? I'm sure skeptics would casually dismiss that one.
- daurnimator 10y agoI thought this was dismissed by saying they were left by an unmanned mission.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- _fizz_buzz_ 10y ago> one can not only look at stuff left behind on the moon's surface I don't think we currently have telescopes that have the resolution to see objects on the moon that were left behind by the Apollo missions.
- DrScump 10y agoThe Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter already has imaged multiple Apollo sites. Lunar Rover tracks are easily seen.
- megablast 10y agoYou are suggesting this would convince moon landing deniers?
- guilhas 10y agoThat's interesting. Where can I see those?
- ejolto 10y agoOn NASAs website[1][2] [1] https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LRO/multimedia/lroimages/apollosites.html https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LRO/multimedia/lroimages/... [2] https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LRO/news/apollo-sites.html https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LRO/news/apollo-sites.htm...