4 ms·
She probably said "no" in order to be able to make further sequels movies with the same top-selling actress (whatever her name is), not due some deep philosophi
by notgood 10y ago
She probably said "no" in order to be able to make further sequels movies with the same top-selling actress (whatever her name is), not due some deep philosophical decision.
- Whitestrake 10y agoThat appears to be an objectionable decision in and of itself, if I understand the argument of the person you've replied to.
- lolive 10y agoShe had already transcended in Lucy. Once is enough...