Thanks for the hard data. I'm a bit confused because the study counts SF, Silicon Valley and SF Mid-Peninsula without defining them well, and there's no mentio

Thanks for the hard data. I'm a bit confused because the study counts SF, Silicon Valley and SF Mid-Peninsula without defining them well, and there's no mention of South Bay at all, unless that's what they're referring to as SV. EDIT: It doesn't seem like SV is being used as an aggregate term, since there's more absolute growth happening in SF and SF Mid-Peninsula than in SV. EDIT2: Unless I'm terrible at reading charts and tables, it looks a lot like San Francisco hit 72,205 in 2015, not 76,200.