4 ms·
Thank you! Of course I read it, just (as it is a new thing) still guessing what is a good fit, and what isn't. (For some reason I though that this t-SNE articl
by stared 10y ago
Thank you! Of course I read it, just (as it is a new thing) still guessing what is a good fit, and what isn't.
(For some reason I though that this t-SNE article was published elsewhere. Now I see that it was on Distill, but just before its big start.)
- colah3 10y agoYep, we're still clarifying our policies. If you have questions, please email us! (Distill needs to be extra careful about a lot of this stuff because we're trying to build legitimacy for a kind of work that many people are inclined to not treat as academic contributions. So on some things, like being a primary publication, we may end up taking a more defensive posture than we would in an ideal world.)
- stared 10y agoI wish all the best to this wonderful initiative! (As a side note, my co-advisor dreamt about this style of communication in science (though, in physics): https://physicsnapkins.wordpress.com/2012/04/16/a-personal-dream-jpi/. https://physicsnapkins.wordpress.com/2012/04/16/a-personal-d...) I totally understand that you need to be set high reference level at the very beginning, even if at the cost of being a bit "conservative" (I am not sure if the best word here).