By the time you definitely know what a new policy means its too late to do anything about it. In this case, there is most definitely a policy making its way thr

By the time you definitely know what a new policy means its too late to do anything about it. In this case, there is most definitely a policy making its way through the administration, and the problems described by the article are on the table. The mays/coulds/woulds are simply a reflection of the changing nature of an unfinished document. The insinuation that the Guardian is just making it up is wrong on its face. Example: [Homeland Security Secretary] Kelly told a House homeland security committee hearing in February: “We want to say for instance, ‘What sites do you visit? And give us your passwords,’ so that we can see what they do on the internet. If they don’t want to give us that information then they don’t come.” So what's a newspaper supposed to do? Not report on it until it is signed law?