4 ms·
Are they going to turn back everyone who refuses to give social media logins, and everyone who claims not to have a social media account?
by cryptarch 10y ago
Are they going to turn back everyone who refuses to give social media logins, and everyone who claims not to have a social media account?
- sqeaky 10y agoThe article and quotes in it make it sound like they will turn away people who refuse. The article and my earlier post included not having accounts in the grey area that makes this look unenforceable. I took 30 seconds to come up with my of ways to defeat this. Clearly it is a stupid rule and in my opinion a cheap attempt to garner votes by politicians looking for high visibility low impact things they can do. I say low impact because someone dumb enough to support this isn't smart enough to see all the negatives it can have as well, for the person seeking votes the negatives here are low impact.
- maccard 10y agoNo, but they're going to turn away anyone who thinks they're going to outsmart a guy with nothing to do but make your day more difficult by wiping their phone and claiming they don't use social media or email. If you claim to not use social media, have a top of the range movie device and/or high powered portable computer, both completely clean with no signs of use, and a smug "I don't use social media" response, you're only going to make your trip more painful, and risk getting turned away.
- sqeaky 10y agoThat is why this rule is going to hurt the US more than help it. It comes with a real cost, but that cost is hard to measure. That one traveler that is turned away, won't pay for a hotel, any food, or any tourism. That will cost jobs in the long run. The terrorist arriving will have time to carefully craft fake accounts not related to his real ones. This is just more reason to think the rule is stop and clearly a political move to strengthen the xenophobic base.