Just poking fun at the way these things are presented in pop.sci. media. Anyway, talking over my head, I'm not shure formal systems are a good way of modelling

Just poking fun at the way these things are presented in pop.sci. media. Anyway, talking over my head, I'm not shure formal systems are a good way of modelling the mind itself. Formal systems are (usually) considered consistent. The mind is not. Neither are neural nets. And it's interesting how neural nets, and other statistical models/algorithms that drop the requirement of always beeing right, seems more much more capable in certain practical matters.