4 ms·
Most proposed "solutions" to this problem directly attack multiple people's livelihoods. They can, should and must defend against these things tooth and nail. E
by noobiemcfoob 10y ago
Most proposed "solutions" to this problem directly attack multiple people's livelihoods. They can, should and must defend against these things tooth and nail. Expecting otherwise is naive.
Real solutions look like building out a renewable infrastructure. A thing that is happening everyday already, spearheaded by humanely conscious individuals and companies (Google, Apple, etc). There is literally nothing for the government to do in this situation but get out of the way and facilitate such endeavours.
Instead, we talk about carbon taxes >.>
- euyyn 10y agoI remember a presidential candidate proposing a solution that was boosting the building of renewable infrastructure and technology, so exactly what you propose. I think calling that a "humanely conscious" government, as you say, would have been appropriate too.
- noobiemcfoob 10y agoI'd rather that president lower my taxes and leave the infrastructure business to companies that actually understand how it connects to everything else.
- sdflkd 10y agoI can't tell if this is satire?
- euyyn 10y agoBy those beliefs, you'd rather NASA not had bootstrapped the commercial space business that now has SpaceX developing reusable rockets.
- noobiemcfoob 10y agoYes, I would be against any program developed for military reasons. NASA has produced a ton of amazing things. But they did it so we could blow people up.