right. i agree. and the original post seems to make an unjustified leap at the end. after spending the entire article discussing how traffic congestion didn't i

right. i agree. and the original post seems to make an unjustified leap at the end. after spending the entire article discussing how traffic congestion didn't increase, they say: ...its a strong sign that more modest changes to road systems really don’t have much impact on metropolitan prosperity. the amount of traffic congestion and the economic prosperity of the Atlanta region are not the same thing at all. where does the article support the notion that the economy was not hurt?