3 ms·
We should probably start having regulations around IOT servcies. The issue here isn't that the customer or the service rep was abusive. The real issue is that t
by jitix 10y ago
We should probably start having regulations around IOT servcies. The issue here isn't that the customer or the service rep was abusive. The real issue is that the company can disable the cloud service that is essential for their product to work based on their perception of the customer.
It seems really risky to purchase IOT products right now.
- bigbugbag 10y agoCould it be different though ? IOT is closely related to MMO videogames in that most servers close down at some point in the not so distant future. I will not buy any IoT ever, even with regulations. Factor in that IoT has terrible security and has already been massively exploited and now you're part of a criminal ring of webcam owners or fridges or whatever gizmo that attempted to DoS a DNS root server or government or antiterrorist unit and according to laws you can be jailed/decapitated/fined or worse.
- jitix 10y agoHmm.. in that case some sort of classification should be there. Games are non-essential but temperature controller, door openers and locks are essential functionalities. As a general rule the manufacturers of IOT devices should be made by law release the server side code/binaries that a consumer could run by yourself (and also provide configuration options on the hardware device itself). I know it won't be of much use to most consumers as of now but as people become more techology-literate they should be able to download a container, choose a cloud provider and upload it to run the backend. As IPv6 become more popular home routers could expand their functionality to provide container hosting. edit: Added the part about self-hosting.