3 ms·
>Instead, if you tried to wave it, handset makers would have walked and just done something else. Heck, some did! Yes some have and some more would have. And t
by fauigerzigerk 10y ago
>Instead, if you tried to wave it, handset makers would have walked and just done something else. Heck, some did!
Yes some have and some more would have. And then it would have been up to these holdouts to come up with a viable OS. Good luck with that. Almost everybody who tried has failed.
There is no doubt in my mind that Google could force it successfully, but why would they? Everything is moving in their direction anyway and users don't seem fazed.
- halflings 10y agoBy the same logic: Why wouldn't they? Surely Google is not intentionally refraining from solving the high fragmentation it is suffering from (which makes developing for Android harder, and keeps some people from receiving security updates)
- fauigerzigerk 10y ago>Why wouldn't they? Because it causes friction, it's a distraction for management, and there is a danger that some of those rebel handset makers could have some success or get poached by Microsoft/Bing even if they fail at creating an alternative OS. There is risk without much upside for Google compared to the gradual approach they are taking now.