3 ms·
As I recall, Google tried a laxer approach early in Android's history, and the quality results were pretty disastrous. Why do we fault the company for taking s
by fixermark 10y ago
As I recall, Google tried a laxer approach early in Android's history, and the quality results were pretty disastrous.
Why do we fault the company for taking steps to pull Android as a brand together?
- ocdtrekkie 10y agoI actually really loved the choice and freedom we used to have and Android, and thought it was a valuable trade off for platform unity. Now we have a very homogenous platform that is still horribly insecure... The worst of both worlds. Google uses their agreements with OEMs to force them to bundle apps and including Google's branding, and protect their business, but refuses to use those agreements to ensure even basic security for their users.
- fixermark 10y agoI don't think I follow. In what sense is Android horribly insecure? More interestingly: in what sense is it horribly insecure that it wouldn't be if we lived in a world where Google didn't have the market agreements to, say, force security patches for pieces of the Android OS core that were broken? Because we already lived in that world, and it was less secure than the one we live in now, to my memory. Security issue in one of the Android libraries that are now part of Play Services? Good luck; wait for your OEM to update your OS.