4 ms·
I highly recommend Wired's article about GM's long-term bet in developing the Bolt. It talks about many ways that developing an electric car is not just a matte
by thinkling 10y ago
I highly recommend Wired's article about GM's long-term bet in developing the Bolt. It talks about many ways that developing an electric car is not just a matter of adding batteries to your existing expertise in car manufacturing.
e.g.:
> Nearly everything changes when you opt for a fundamentally different power train, so GM’s greatest advantage—more than a century of experience building cars—was all but moot. Car structure was different, since they were building around a battery, not an engine. The brakes, steering, and air conditioner were powered differently. New systems, from electromagnetics for the motors to onboard and off-board charging, each came with its own learning curve. The engineers didn’t have established tests to follow. Just turning on the car required finding the perfect sequence of electrical signals from more than a dozen modules. “Oh my God, it took us forever to get the first Volt to start,” Fletcher says.
https://www.wired.com/2016/01/gm-electric-car-chevy-bolt-mary-barra/ https://www.wired.com/2016/01/gm-electric-car-chevy-bolt-mar...
- bostonpete 10y agoIs there an echo in here?
- thinkling 10y agoThanks, fixed.
- madengr 10y agoThough there is more to a card than just the power train. Maybe that explains some of the quality issues Tesla is having with non power train parts such as doors, leaky roofs, etc.
- John23832 10y agoThat's an interesting thing to notice. Most of their issue do seem to be more car related than drive terrain. Guess that goes to my point though, being a car manufacturer is much more than making the car.
- batter 10y agoNo wonder they crushed EV1, they didn't know how to start it.