3 ms·
> it's a perfectly reasonable explanation of what's happening. It's not false, but it's not entirely true. The uncertainty principle doesn't state that you can
by pif 10y ago
> it's a perfectly reasonable explanation of what's happening.
It's not false, but it's not entirely true. The uncertainty principle doesn't state that you can't _measure_ p and q with arbitrary precision. It states that you cannot _imagine_ them with arbitrary precision. It's like the double slit experiment: when you measure which slit is traversed, interference patterns disappear; but, when you don't measure, you cannot even _think_ that the photon is passing through one slit instead of the other.
- jeffwass 10y agoI don't follow your comment on imagining the measurements. Uncertainty Principle refers to the arbitrary precision of two operators. You can measure each operator individually to arbitrary precision. In theory, that is. If the two operators commute you can get theoretical arbitrary precision on both measurements together. Since their commutator is zero. If they don't commute, the product of standard deviations of each measurement operator is restricted to no less than half the expectation value of their commutator. (photon-torpedo's comment at the top of this thread gives a better summary).
- khana 10y agoI think HUP is best framed as a consequence of matter as a wave coupled with the observer effect.
- pif 10y agoIt's not "imagining the measurements". The UP is not only: "You can't know position and momentum together." It rather: "Position and measurement _cannot be defined_ together." In classical mechanics, you can imagine a particle being at a certain position with a certain momentum. In quantum mechanics, you cannot.
- jeffwass 10y agoSorry, I have no idea what you're trying to convey in the first two paragraphs.
- parenthephobia 10y ago> the uncertainty principle states... That the product of the standard deviations of position and momentum are at least half of h-bar. It says nothing else about what that "means", the mechanism by which it comes about, or whether it is a fundamentally "true" description of reality.
- pif 10y agoNeither it says anything about measurement. What I wanted to stress is that it isn't "just" a limitation about measurement precision: it forces you to switch to a description of nature which is far away from the classical one, at least at the microscopic level.