3 ms·
Because that would result in poor performers simply getting passed around ad infinitum. There are companies where this is the de facto policy, and it's pretty b
by skj 10y ago
Because that would result in poor performers simply getting passed around ad infinitum. There are companies where this is the de facto policy, and it's pretty bad for all involved.
- johan_larson 10y agoSure, but if that's the intent, it would be better to set a limit on the number of successive poor performance reviews someone is allowed. Two? Three, maybe? People underperform for all sorts of reasons, and one of them is a skills mismatch. The fix for that is to find a team where the worker's skillset fits better. And a blanket ban on transfers prohibits this solution.
- sjg007 10y agoIt misses the point that the manager can be the reason.