4 ms·
I love how you believe that most reviewers have time to conduct a thorough review for a journal, most of the time. As opposed to something much closer to "LGTM
by apathy 10y ago
I love how you believe that most reviewers have time to conduct a thorough review for a journal, most of the time.
As opposed to something much closer to "LGTM!" With some "but be sure to cite my vaguely-relevant work in Foo et al, 1952".
- lutusp 10y ago> I love how you believe that most reviewers have time to conduct a thorough review for a journal, most of the time. Your objection is to a position I never took -- in fact I suggested the opposite. The depth of a review is gauged by its length, not its accuracy or objectivity.
- apathy 10y agoAh, OK. I think we are on the same page. My mistake.