4 ms·
Which is why if such orders were being issued it'd be more like blue state stationed divisions sent to quell uprisings in red state areas and vice versa. This i
by devonkim 10y ago
Which is why if such orders were being issued it'd be more like blue state stationed divisions sent to quell uprisings in red state areas and vice versa. This is a huge part of why I think a growing political divide is such a problem - we can be easily persuaded to attack each other when the problem isn't each other but the ones issuing the orders.
- maxerickson 10y agoTexas is split inside itself: http://www.nytimes.com/elections/results/texas http://www.nytimes.com/elections/results/texas (The map is even still a lie; there are large counties that voted Republican, but the majority of the red by area is tiny little county populations.) I also don't think that people are particularly stationed by their home state.
- ydt 10y agoOr Blackwater (Xe) mercenaries.
- ryanmarsh 10y agoThere just aren't enough.
- coredog64 10y agoA division stationed in a blue state isn't going to be made up of locals. It's going to have the same mix as the US military in general (read: Mostly southern states). The National Guard will be more representative of their home base, but that is going to be smaller forces that complement active duty, not replace it.
- devonkim 10y agoI was meaning more of metaphorical constructs of blue and red rather than just the political jargon and probably should have used quotes. I'm an army brat and former DoD IC contractor and know very well how distributed personnel get.
- ryanmarsh 10y agoAnd everyone at Ft. Hood will just sit there while Dallas is leveled. First you'd need a political purge of the Army. Anything less would leave the door open to a split in the military. I think history supports this well.