3 ms·
The growth rate of a function obviously has nothing to do with the first few values, I don't know why you would assume those were the ones that surprised me, or
by Grue3 10y ago
The growth rate of a function obviously has nothing to do with the first few values, I don't know why you would assume those were the ones that surprised me, or that I don't know how to calculate them. What I wanted to point out is that this function approaches its limit (100%) very slowly, much slower than 100(1-1/n), or even 100(1-1/log(n)).
- demonshalo 10y ago> or that I don't know how to calculate them. apologies, I don't know your background nor do I have an insight as to what goes on in your head. All I wanted to point out is that it's actually not a surprising growth rate. And while yes, you are right about the "speed" of the function. However that is not "unexpected". At least I don't find that to be the case personally!