3 ms·

You didn't respond to the first point about astroturfing.

• caminante 10y ago
  The first sentence argues that buying the lock and posting a video of cracking the lock would be financially positive. It's also not astroturfing if the company itself is advertising the product. The video's linked from Bowley's youtube channel.
  • Teever 10y ago
    So is wonderous working for this company?
    • caminante 10y ago
      What's your point/argument?
      • mentat 10y ago
        In Hacker News it's considered to be good form to disclose financial associations. Do you also work for the company?
        • caminante 9y ago
          >Do you also work for the company? I submit that your statement relies on an unfounded premise (at least from my scan of this thread) that wonderous works for the company. Also, by your standard, if wonderous doesn't work for said company, he's still complying with your "standard." Yet, you're still making an implicit accusation. The purpose of my initial comment was to address the potshot accusation of astroturfing after, IMHO, wonderous had responded in good faith.
• deleted 10y ago
  [deleted]