3 ms·
Performance comparison: Rails 1.2.6 vs 2.0.2
- azsromej 19y agoI swear I was searching for a post on this topic just last night. nickb is a powerful discovery engine.
- redditrocks 19y agothey should rewrite ruby on rails in C++ so it'd be faster.
- Glimjaur 19y agohttp://weblog.rubyonrails.org/2008/3/18/comparing-rails-2-0-to-1-2-for-speed http://weblog.rubyonrails.org/2008/3/18/comparing-rails-2-0-... "Hongli Lai has compared a dummy scaffold application from Rails 1.2 to Rails 2.0 and found the latter to be 30-50% faster. That’s great to see. But what I think is even more interesting is the progress we’ve been making on performance optimizations for more substantial applications. Rails 2.0 made a lot of progress for applications with lots of assets and for ones with big routes.rb files. The forthcoming Rails 2.1 will move things forward even further."
- technoguyrob 19y agoSummary: Rails 2 is 30-50% faster. Rails 1.2 spends lots of time in session store, so turn it off for max speed (when not using Rails 2). On a side note, what's up with the uhh...header image on the blog?