3 ms·
I get the sense that that's exactly how these were created. The transition from ground view to aerial view gives no hint of a full-sized aircraft's ideal lift-o
by terminado 10y ago
I get the sense that that's exactly how these were created. The transition from ground view to aerial view gives no hint of a full-sized aircraft's ideal lift-off point.
These are probably all hand-stitched though, with photo manipulation tools, and not programmatically generated, since it seems to be a one-off project inspired by the surrounding environment and terrain. It's likely possible to program a utility that creates these, as a follow-up phase to the general concept.
- TheSpiceIsLife 10y agoFrom the article: Using his skills in 3-D animation and visual effects to assemble multiple overhead shots into seamless photographs
- mannykannot 10y agoThe foreground shots are not overhead shots, which is why a drone seems the most (if not only) plausible source for the raw images.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- mannykannot 10y ago> The transition from ground view to aerial view gives no hint of a full-sized aircraft's ideal lift-off point. Especially the one of the Blue Mosque (not in the original article, but from a collection it links to.) That's what convinced me it had to be a drone, at least for the oblique shots.