3 ms·
> ... but I still like the concepts and syntax of Go much better The concept of not having features because someone on your team might use them? You subtly say
by 59nadir 10y ago
> ... but I still like the concepts and syntax of Go much better
The concept of not having features because someone on your team might use them? You subtly say that Rust is a worse language because it doesn't seem like it was designed in the 80's, when clearly as a language (together with the compiler), it's objectively better than Go.
- JepZ 10y agoI did not say that Rust is a worse language. I said I like Go better. I do not know exactly what it is, but I find rust code harder to read (e.g. I do not like the :: operator, which other languages have too). So this is my personal preference and should not offend any Rust fans. Besides the syntax, which reminds me too much of C++, I think Rust is a very good language. I do not know if it is 'objectively better than Go.'. Btw. restrictions are not always bad.