3 ms·
Although I'm not sure "its K&R equivalent" is correct (that's C89 and has "modern" function implementations), C99 is indeed not that common. If only because man
by JoachimSchipper 16y ago
Although I'm not sure "its K&R equivalent" is correct (that's C89 and has "modern" function implementations), C99 is indeed not that common. If only because many compilers don't support it (including Microsoft's).
- js2 16y agoBah, I learned my C from K&R 2nd ed. I guess that's not K&R C, is it? :-)
- JoachimSchipper 16y agoIt's... complicated. K&R 2nd ed. (which is an excellent book!) is based on a draft of ANSI C; pre-ANSI C was not standardized but rather based on an informal reading of K&R 1st ed., hence "K&R syntax" and the like. At least, if I recall correctly.