> But go ahead, which experiment confirms existence of antimatter? There are hundreds, but let's provide the first: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positron http

> But go ahead, which experiment confirms existence of antimatter? There are hundreds, but let's provide the first: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positron https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positron I would have said "supports with evidence" rather than "confirms", in the spirit of falsifiable science. Your argument asks for proof of antimatter, as though science is a religion. But science is a discipline whose purpose is to attempt to falsify ideas, not elevate them to the status of beliefs. Those ideas that resist falsification represent our current understanding of nature, and any of them can be replaced by new theories and new evidence.