3 ms·

I, on the other hand, get the feeling from reading the article that the author understands that this performance difference was due to implementation difference

I, on the other hand, get the feeling from reading the article that the author understands that this performance difference was due to implementation differences, but wanted a more attention-grabbing title. My subjective impression is that this is the first time the author has come across this sort of consideration in implementation and wanted to write about it. There is nothing wrong with that - in fact, I think it's great! It's just that the title leads one to expect, well, quite a bit more.

boyter 10y ago
Not the first time but the first time in a while and the first time I have ever written about the process. I was literally just writing down my experience post event. The title was just taken from the Stackoverflow post which I agree in this context is a little click baity. I never expected it to get this much attention though, as stated in the first sentence it was just something I did for myself more than anything.