4 ms·

Except you're ignoring a whole big chunk of data in the form of expert opinion and knowledge.

• pier25 10y ago
  So far I haven't seen a single "expert opinion" that explains why the wings of the plane disappeared leaving no trace. https://truthandshadows.files.wordpress.com/2010/09/pentagonxox30.jpg https://truthandshadows.files.wordpress.com/2010/09/pentagon...
  • sanswork 10y ago
    You mean the thin bags of jet fuel attached to the side of the plane? The things that would almost certainly have folded back slighly before disintegrating? You admit elsewhere to not being an expert so your expectations are built not on knowledge of planes but on your imagination. Also have you actually looked at expert opinion on the crash for your answers or have you limited yourself to silly graphics like you added?
    • pier25 10y ago
      > The things that would almost certainly have folded back slighly before disintegrating? Nothing disintegrates my friend, that's science fiction. > have you limited yourself to silly graphics like you added? It seems you missed the actual photography.
      • sanswork 10y ago
        If you think nothing breaks into small pieces then I can understand why you're so confused. What actual photography? Someone overlaid an image of a jet on the building and drew lines where a 5 year old would expect the wings to impact. Luckily(?) we don't live in the looney tunes universe do when a soft objecy hits a brick wall it doesn't leave an exact shape in the wall.
      • nkrisc 10y ago
        The wings are there, they just don't look much like wings anymore.
      • ceejayoz 10y ago
        > Nothing disintegrates my friend, that's science fiction. Here. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RZjhxuhTmGk https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RZjhxuhTmGk