4 ms·
Once you account for cost of living you don't make all the much less in somewhere like, say, Boston. And Boston has suburbs that you can actually commute from.
by throwaway2016a 10y ago
Once you account for cost of living you don't make all the much less in somewhere like, say, Boston. And Boston has suburbs that you can actually commute from. The traffic is awful but not California awful.
- salesguy222 10y agoThe weather and cost situation isn't that much better in Boston, but it is definitely more commutable than SF. Personally I would eschew megalopolises all together!
- MegaButts 10y agoI think this will vary for a lot of people, but I live in the outer sunset area in San Francisco where there is little traffic, free parking, numerous uncrowded parks, and I live in a house with a yard instead of an apartment. It takes me ~30 minutes to get downtown for work, door to door, using public transportation. Oh - and there's almost no crime here. Personally I enjoy this part of the city. It seems better in most ways and it's far cheaper. I would hate living downtown as I have a large dog. I admittedly was incredibly lucky in finding this place (moving to a city with a large dog reduces your options by an order of magnitude), but it's been great. It seems most of my friends have tiny apartments and numerous roommates, and my girlfriend and I honestly have more space than we know what to do with - and we (usually) pay less money than them. I do miss snow though.