3 ms·
I had to take down the website for my business and can only accept brick & mortar transactions because of trolls... but sure I guess you can win at your comment
by accountface 10y ago
I had to take down the website for my business and can only accept brick & mortar transactions because of trolls... but sure I guess you can win at your commenting game by claiming everything is shit.
I've been running a business with multiple locations for 10 years and I've never had a problem more serious than trolls on the internet doxxing me.
- problems 10y agoSee, this is the problem. Don't blame it on "trolls", analyze where you screwed up and how you could have defended yourself better so you know what to do next time. Then open up shop under a different alias. If you're not vigilant about your own security and safety, no one else will do it for you. Take responsibility for your own actions.
- accountface 10y agoSomeone literally came to my house, where I live.
- problems 10y agoWhy was that information available on the internet? That's the kind of risk you take if you make that kind of information available on the internet. Think of all the possible things someone could do with your address and assume those will be done. That's the type of precaution you should be taking.
- UncleMeat 10y agoIt is pretty hard to operate a business and not have this information be available for a sufficiently interested person.
- problems 10y agoI do it myself. It's completely possible. Get a PO box or pay a corporate privacy company to forward your mail. Depends how you operate though I suppose. Unless you're running a physical business from your house you probably don't need to disclose.
- jdietrich 10y agoDoxxing a business owner is generally very straightforward even if they take careful steps to hide their identity - there's a huge paper trail behind any real business. If you think you can't be doxxed, you're probably just lucky.
- accountface 10y agoMy city publicly lists assessing information if you own property. Many do. Why are you so set on blaming me for this? Do you want copies of restraining orders I had to file on the two people who came to my house? When do you think someone should start being responsible for behaving dangerously?
- cmdrfred 10y agoWhy were you selected over any other business owner? Just seems odd you would be selected at random and then two different people would make an effort to drive out to your house "for the lols".
- accountface 10y agoSorry, if I go into details it'll be pretty obvious who I am. My entire point is that internet trolls aren't just some sort of harmless fun for a lot of people.
- problems 10y ago> My city publicly lists assessing information if you own property. Many do. People tend not to just browse city property listings for fun. So why were they able to get to that stage - did they have your name? Why? What did you do to piss them off? Could you have done it anonymously?
- mirimir 10y agoWhat did they want?
- sp332 10y agoThis is pretty egregious victim-blaming. If someone is getting abused it is the fault of the abuser and no one else.
- problems 10y agoYou're as much a victim here as someone who downloads a tiny executable off a filesharing network and thinks it's the latest movie or game. Or falls for a Nigerian scam. These are accepted facts of the internet. We defend against them. Just as much as publishing your address or information which can be associated to it should be. Precautions are important. You can never rid the world of evil, but you can protect yourself from it, especially trivially in this case.
- sp332 10y agoWe made Nigerian scams illegal. We defend against them partly by prosecuting them. We work hard to reduce the frequency and the impact of them. But you're not saying that we should do any of that for trolls. I don't accept that trolling is just something that necessarily happens and that we need to accept. We can hold trolls accountable and work to reduce trolling overall.
- problems 10y ago> We made Nigerian scams illegal. We defend against them partly by prosecuting them. We work hard to reduce the frequency and the impact of them. And guess what? They still happen. We already have the laws to attack the kind of "troll" that shows up at your door in many cases - but guess what? It still happens. Ultimately the law only gets you so far. So we must defend against them in more effective ways - like individual knowledge. It's a lot easier and more effective to guarantee safety with online matters when you behave safely online than when you start taking risks and expect the law, the website or whatever else to deal with the consequences. That's just wishfully naive thinking. Yes, in an absolute sense, all harm should be blamed on the abuser, I don't mean to suggest otherwise. But the prevention potential is so much higher if you can attack it at it's destination than at its source - like using a firewall on your server instead of just saying "hacking is illegal, therefore no one will hack me".