That part really resonated with me as well. Well the whole article did... it really matches my professional experience with Clojure (except I've never looked at

That part really resonated with me as well. Well the whole article did... it really matches my professional experience with Clojure (except I've never looked at transducers.) I still don't feel great about error handling in Clojure in general. I can't find something that feels both practical and idiomatic. I want to use monads but it always feels like huge impedance mismatch with the rest of the language (most of the time due to nil being semantically overloaded.)