3 ms·
> Trump was essentially a five million dollar contrarian put option See, this is what distinguishes the SV circle jerk bubble from Peter Thiel. Trump was not,
by gragas 10y ago
> Trump was essentially a five million dollar contrarian put option
See, this is what distinguishes the SV circle jerk bubble from Peter Thiel. Trump was not, in fact, a contrarian put option. Many companies are extremely hopeful about a future under Trump rather than Hillary; this is reflected in the extremely bullish market since Trump's election.
Everyone in SV flounders around thinking "how could Trump be a good thing? how could anyone ever bet on him? he's a sexist/racist/xenophobe!" Perhaps SV is right that Trump is truly [X|Y|Z], but they are wrong in thinking that it has so much weight on the economy. It is clearly not the case that the consensus is a Trump presidency will ravage the economy---good sentiment about a future under him is literally baked into the price of the S&P 500.
Peter Thiel's bet on Trump was only contrarian in places like Sillicon Valley.
- igk 10y agoWhat's your analysis on why this is? Because the assumption is he will bring back the robber baron times, which were good for established businesses? This is the only interpretation that makes sense to me, since everything I've seen so far looks like selling the long term future for short term gain. But I'm leftwing and humanist for European standards, so i have an obvious bias.