3 ms·

- FLAVOR: Ubuntu Desktop - HEADLINE: Hide/Move/Replace the Unity Menubar - DESCRIPTION: Please have an auto-hide function at minimum? Better would be to move

- FLAVOR: Ubuntu Desktop - HEADLINE: Hide/Move/Replace the Unity Menubar - DESCRIPTION: Please have an auto-hide function at minimum? Better would be to move the time/settings to the "dock" when you set the "move the menus to the app windows" option, and then removing menubar entirely. - RATIONALE: It was awful the last time I used Ubuntu on a multi-monitor setup, wasting space on all displays. And having to click an app and window to give it focus, then swinging the cursor up to select a menu, then back to the app... I'm not sure why anyone would move the action (menu) from the context of the action (focused window). Otherwise, I really do like Unity, especially since it has useful global keybindings out of the box. - ROLE/AFFILIATION: Developer, but use Ubuntu for my personal dev ThinkPad. P.S. I just started listening to The Changelog and your interview was very insightful. Thanks! For those interested: https://changelog.com/podcast/207 https://changelog.com/podcast/207

reitanqild 10y ago
And having to click an app and window to give it focus, then swinging the cursor up to select a menu, then back to the app... I think it is copied from Mac.
jernfrost 10y ago
This is a topic debated to death between Mac and Windows users. Here is the argument in favor of the Mac/Ubuntu solution. The time it takes to hit a target is inverse proportional to its size, according to fitts law. A menubar at at the top has infinite height, thus it is a really large area to hit. In practice that makes it much faster to hit a menu bar at the top than inside a window. What you don't want is an autohiding menu bar. When it autohides you can't see the location of the target before you move your mouse. For people who use this setup are used to throwing the mouse pointer up quickly to the target. You can't do that if the menu is hidden. Then it is a two step process. First throwing the mouse up to the menu and then making a selection. This is the reason why we keep all frequently accessed GUI elements on the corners of the screen. These are the quickest places to hit. E.g. the Windows start button is fast to hit for this reason. But to be fair you are using the application menu bar a lot more frequent than the start menu.
- Userwithaname 10y ago
  You do have a point, you can't see the menu-bar items when they're hidden, however, I used Mac OS for work in the past, and the full-screen mode (in which the menu-bar does indeed auto-hide) is actually great. Even though you can't see the buttons, I was able to quickly memorize the rough location of what I want to press, so it didn't actually slow me down that much, even in heavily menu-reliant applications. I feel like this would be even less of an issue with Ubuntu, since it has the menu-bar search feature, where you can "press" a button by typing it's name rather than looking through the menus.
dustinkirkland 10y ago
Thank you for the feedback, and thanks for listening (and linking here for others)!
- Slackwise 10y ago
  Thanks for taking the time to read. Hopefully it doesn't sound like a petty request. Keep up the good work!

reitanqild 10y ago

And having to click an app and window to give it focus, then swinging the cursor up to select a menu, then back to the app... I think it is copied from Mac.

jernfrost 10y ago

This is a topic debated to death between Mac and Windows users. Here is the argument in favor of the Mac/Ubuntu solution. The time it takes to hit a target is inverse proportional to its size, according to fitts law. A menubar at at the top has infinite height, thus it is a really large area to hit. In practice that makes it much faster to hit a menu bar at the top than inside a window. What you don't want is an autohiding menu bar. When it autohides you can't see the location of the target before you move your mouse. For people who use this setup are used to throwing the mouse pointer up quickly to the target. You can't do that if the menu is hidden. Then it is a two step process. First throwing the mouse up to the menu and then making a selection. This is the reason why we keep all frequently accessed GUI elements on the corners of the screen. These are the quickest places to hit. E.g. the Windows start button is fast to hit for this reason. But to be fair you are using the application menu bar a lot more frequent than the start menu.

Userwithaname 10y ago
You do have a point, you can't see the menu-bar items when they're hidden, however, I used Mac OS for work in the past, and the full-screen mode (in which the menu-bar does indeed auto-hide) is actually great. Even though you can't see the buttons, I was able to quickly memorize the rough location of what I want to press, so it didn't actually slow me down that much, even in heavily menu-reliant applications. I feel like this would be even less of an issue with Ubuntu, since it has the menu-bar search feature, where you can "press" a button by typing it's name rather than looking through the menus.

dustinkirkland 10y ago

Thank you for the feedback, and thanks for listening (and linking here for others)!

Slackwise 10y ago
Thanks for taking the time to read. Hopefully it doesn't sound like a petty request. Keep up the good work!