5 ms·
"It's not Apple-like." You emailed the wrong person. It's AT&T, not Apple. They're two very separate companies. To be honest, I've had less trouble with AT&T t
by leviathant 16y ago
"It's not Apple-like."
You emailed the wrong person. It's AT&T, not Apple. They're two very separate companies. To be honest, I've had less trouble with AT&T than any of the other telecoms. This change prompted me to check my data usage for the last six months and I was surprised to find that I actually use less than 200mb a month on my iPhone - these new plans are actually going to save me money.
- ihodes 16y agoThis I realize. I also know that Apple has more influence in this than AT&T does, by sheer force of economy if nothing else. I somehow doubt this either happened without Apple's approval, or if it did, something will be changing with regards to AT&T's exclusive rights to the iPhone in the near future. Besides, had I emailed AT&T's CEO, I may have received a cease and desist. Didn't want to chance that: http://9to5mac.com/ATT_FAIL http://9to5mac.com/ATT_FAIL
- jrockway 16y agoAT&T should realize that they'd be out of business (because of their poor customer support and poor network) without the iPhone. I would think that if they do realize that, then they would listen to what Apple has to say.
- leviathant 16y agoJust like Sprint's out of business. Just like T-Mobile's out of business. Just like Verizon's out of business. Wait, what? They all have terrible customer support, and I've had zero complaints about AT&T's coverage while I've had my phone, with the exception of when I was at Lollapalooza a couple of years ago, where I got no signal at all, which added salty irony to all the AT&T sponsorship banners in Grant Park that year. You can't possibly believe that "American Telephone & Telegraph" would so easily be out of the telephone business without the iPhone. That's an absurd notion.